Ati firegl v7600 for gaming
R XTP Secondary. R Consumer 4P. R Consumer 4P Secondary. Radeon Radeon Graphics. Radeon 6xxx series. Radeon DV Edition. Radeon Secondary. Radeon XT Secondary.
Radeon Graphics Processor. Radeon HD Graphics. Radeon HD Radeon HD Series. Radeon HD LE. Radeon HD Pro. Radeon HD XT. Radeon HD X2 Series. Radeon HD GT. Radeon HD - Dell Optiplex. Radeon HD X2. Radeon HD graphics. Radeon HD A Graphics. Radeon HD M. Radeon HD Radeon HDG Radeon Mobility. Radeon Mobility Radeon X Radeon X Secondary. Radeon X Series. Radeon X Series Secondary. Radeon X PRO. Radeon X Series Sec. Radeon X bit. Radeon X bit Secondary. Radeon X Secondary Series.
Radeon XXT. Radeon XXT Secondary. Radeon X GTO. Radeon X Pro. Radeon X Pro Secondary. Radeon X SE. Radeon X SE Secondary. Radeon X FSC. Radeon X CrossFire Edition. Radeon XGTO. Radeon X GT. Radeon X GT Secondary. Radeon X XTX. Radeon XXTX. Radeon Xpress Radeon Xpress Secondary. Radeon Xpress Series. Radeon Xpress Series Secondary. Radeon Xpress M. RAGE The FireGL V uses the same massive R core used in the Radeon HD lineup, which has an estimated mm 2 die size, is comprised of over million transistors, and is based on an 80nm manufacturing process.
Unfortunately, all of the available software-level utilities to try to pinpoint exact clock speeds would not work with the V card, which also kept us from overclocking the card. Keep in mind this is a workstation card though, so the percentage of those actually overclocking a card like this is slim to none. Catalyst Control Center. We did not see any specific FireGL functionality in the driver set. ATI does not publically have FireGL V drivers on their website, so we had to use the bundled drivers that came with our sample board.
One aspect which we feel is worth noting is that the FireGL V does not have bit drivers readily available at this time. Search all. After all, Nvidia's professional product line based on the G80 chip also counts five members, as the following table shows. Workstation Cards with Shader Model 4. Aficionados will also discover several inconsistencies, though. For example, in some cases, the same product is associated with several market segments in the whitepapers.
Additionally, the site lacks any information that would help differentiate between the current product line and last year's models - the model numbers alone give no indication of the what performance class the card actually belongs to. While ATI's product naming scheme is not much more helpful or informative, it helps that the company's website differentiates between the and model years. While we don't want to get ahead of ourselves, we'll say at this point that buying the model is the better choice, regardless of what company you opt for.
To alleviate the problem of the confusing numbering scheme, and to help you tell the newcomers from last year's models, we have created the following table. Here, we attempt to group the cards into performance classes based on their real-world performance. From a hardware perspective, professional cards are not really separately developed products. Instead, they are derivatives of mainstream and gaming cards, making them almost identical to their non-professional counterparts.
However, as you probably know, mainstream cards are a lot less expensive. Now, the resourceful buyer may be tempted to simply choose the cheaper alternative, but the graphics companies take steps to prevent this, by making small changes to the workstation cards' BIOSes and graphics chips.
0コメント