No child left behind reading programs

The penalties only applied to Title I schools. Apart from accountability, NCLB made other changes to federal education law. Here are a few of the most important. This meant that special education teachers had to be certified and demonstrate knowledge in every subject they teach. This is no longer the case. Now, federal law only requires teachers to be state certified and licensed.

NCLB gave more flexibility to states in how they spent federal funding, so long as schools were improving. The law also required schools to use science- and research-based instruction and teaching methods. Lastly, kids with Individualized Education Programs IEPs and plans often have accommodations to help them learn in school. NCLB required states to allow these kids to use accommodations on statewide tests. This rule still applies.

Read more about accommodations on standardized tests. People have mixed feelings about NCLB. On the positive side, many believe NCLB led to a greater focus on struggling students. The law set the expectation that they learn alongside their peers. By making schools report results by subgroup, NCLB shined a light on students in poverty, students of color, those receiving special education services, and English language learners.

NCLB pushed schools to give struggling students more attention, support, and help. More students graduated under the law. The graduation rate for students with specific learning disabilities increased from 57 percent in to 68 percent in On the other hand, some say that NCLB focused too much on standardized testing.

This left little time for anything else kids may have needed or wanted to learn. Certain penalties, like requiring school improvement plans, were reasonable, critics said. Critics linked several cheating scandals to NCLB, citing the pressure on teachers and educators to perform.

This includes the reporting of school results, inclusion of kids, and research-based instruction. Individualized Education Program. Podcast Wunder community app. Main menu Our work Blog Surveys and research. Join our team Privacy policy Terms of use Fundraising disclosure Sitemap.

The law held schools accountable for how kids learned and achieved. Funds are dedicated to help states and local school districts eliminate the reading deficit by establishing high-quality, comprehensive reading instruction in kindergarten through grade 3. Building on a solid foundation of research, the program is designed to select, implement, and provide professional development for teachers using scientifically based reading programs, and to ensure accountability through ongoing, valid and reliable screening, diagnostic, and classroom-based assessment.

School library media centers can contribute to improved student achievement by providing up-to-date instructional materials aligned to the curriculum and instructional practices, collaborating with and supporting teachers, administrators, and parents, and extending their hours of operation beyond the school day.

RIF to provide, through aid to local nonprofit groups and volunteer organizations, reading motivation activities. RIF encourages reading both inside and outside of school by allowing youngsters to select books to keep at home.

It is an opportunity for students and their families to continue to learn new skills and discover new abilities after the school day has ended. The focus of this program is to provide expanded academic enrichment opportunities for children attending low performing schools.

Tutorial services and academic enrichment activities are designed to help students meet local and state academic standards in subjects such as reading and math.